6 US MP raised questions on the action of Biden administration on Adani Group, demand for investigation
Washington:
Six members of the US Congress have demanded an inquiry against the action taken by the Judicial Department of Biden Administration on the Group. Regarding this, the US Congress Cocks has written a letter to the Attorney General AG Bandi of the USA. Lance Gooden, Pat Follen, Mike Haridopolos, Brandon Gill, William R. These members named Timans IV, Brian Babin, DDS have described India as an important partner of America and said that the action of Biden DOJ has damaged America’s interests.
‘Loss of America’s interests’
The members of the US Congress have questioned the investigation against Adani Company and raised the demand for a fresh investigation into this action. He has termed some decisions of the Department of Justice (DOJ) as suspicious in the previous government of America. He said that in some decisions of the Department of Justice, some selected cases were carried forward, while some left. Because of this, our relationship with not only the interests of America, but also in India, but also with India has been in danger.
‘America’s relationship with India is very important’
Members of the US Congress in their letter said that India has been an important ally of America for decades. Being the world’s largest democracy, our relationship with him is quite deep. The relations between the two countries are also much above economic, trade and politics. But this historical partnership has been in danger due to some indiscriminate decisions of the Biden administration.
Question on the decision of Biden administration
He said that one such decision taken by the Biden administration mentioned a decision related to Adani Group. He said that the officials of this company are present in India. However, the matter is completely on the allegations. The Biden Judicial Department decided to blame the company officials in this case without any reality, which is like an injury to the interests of America. He said that there was no essential reason to carry forward such a case.
