Lost in Bihar

It is crucial that any motivation to verify voters’ documents and ensure voters’ Rolls-Royce have strong drives.
The Supreme Court’s instructions state that Bihar voters whose voters were wrongly deleted must accept Aadhaar’s instructions. India is working to synchronize two systems, namely paper-driven and digital-dominated, as it tries to transition to the technological interface between states and citizens. The frightening joke is that Aadhaar is a flawed technology because its subcontractor layer is not regulated, but the universality of that identity makes it a necessary ID to simply move things – a gas connection to a telephone connection. This is not to say that, as SC observed, birth certificates or any of the remaining 11 documents cannot be forged.
There are 20 days left after finalizing the voter Rolls-Royce for Bihar parliamentary elections, another Sir-driven exercise caused chaos – rationalization of poll booths, so each has no more than 1,200 voters, down from 1,500. Polling stations have increased from around 77K to nearly 91k. The stalls were renumbered and newly assigned Blos. All of this is done effectively. However, voters who want to use Aadhaar and those who raise objections must deal with the new layout. The new Blow has only 15 days to buy voter documents from his predecessor Blow. The names can be all digitized, but not all verification documents are uploaded. With the renumbering of poll booths, handover confusing the Blos, hindering verification drives.
This is this chaos that the rushing gentleman cannot avoid. The EC’s lawyer told the court that the petitioner’s insistence on Aadhaar was “illegal immigration” on board – a prosecution against Aadhaar and directed a more exclusionary approach than inclusiveness. Bihar Sir shows that digitalization/technology cannot be a solution in itself, and that any exercise to ensure a strong voter volume takes time to thoroughly review. Any jazz has a few months in any poll, just the possibility of losing numbers.
This article is an editorial opinion in the printed version of The Times of India.
End of the article