Nationalist and regional identity-political struggle for the election of Delhi and Bigharbon elections

As an ideological form, nationalism has played a key role in the formation of modern nation -states. It appeared in the 19th century and was affected by the rise of the French Revolution, the Napoleonic War, and democratic ideals. In Italy and Germany, the movement of unity to the nation is particularly obvious, and the concepts of nationalism have also promoted the separationism movement of Poland, Greece and Czechoslovakia. Scholars argue whether nationalism is driven by the country or the country -driven process that the masses or the aimed to consolidate power.

Autocraticism and modern country

The authoritarian monarchy of the 16th and 17th centuries has laid the foundation for centralized countries through claiming tax rights, military control and sovereignty on its territory. According to Charles Tilly, European countries have established a minimized cultural differences within the country, and at the same time increase their differences between them. The centralized process usually suppresses local nobles, clergy and regional councils, and eventually leads to modern sovereign countries. In the late 18th century, especially in the bourgeois revolution in England, France and the Netherlands, this transition was further accelerated.

Role of economic development

Economic transformation plays a vital role in the development of nation -states. INDISTRIALIZATIThe spread of the spread in the United Kingdom and its spread to continental Europe has created economic competition, which has led to the needs of national market and state intervention.

• From a historical perspective, Alexander Gerschenkron (Alexander Gerschenkron) believes that industrialization people like Germany and Russia relied on strong state intervention to perform industrialization, usually tariff protection and Carterization.

• The Friedrich list challenged the British -promoted Free Trade theory, and Friedrich List challenged trade protectionist policies, allowing economies like Germany to develop industrial capabilities.

• The role of nationalism in economic policies is obvious in Germany. In Germany, industrialists and businessmen in favor of political unity established a single economic market after the war from 1864-1871.

In Italy, nationalism was closely related to the literary tradition (Dan Ding) and the revolutionary movement (Mazzini’s young Italy). Economic nationalism will appear later, especially when industrialists seek integration through railway networks and economic unification. Unlike Germany, Italian industrialists are weak and split. The unified process is largely led by landlords and urban professionals (such as Cavour and Minghetti).

State, country and nationalism

The 19th century saw the integration of national and nationalism, where the concept of territorial sovereignty became the core of the formation of national state. Nationalism operates in three main ways-

• As seen in England and France, it has promoted the development of democratic relations between the country and its citizens.

• It helps unify the diverse culture and economic region into homogeneous national identity.

• It leads to the division of the political community and creates a new country based on race, language and cultural history.

Scholars like Max Weber and Vi Lenin emphasize that nationalism should be understood as relations with the country. In this country, it is both the power of integration and division. In cases of Germany and Italy, nationalism has led to unity, and in Scandinavia and Poland, it encourages separation from larger political entities.

Nationalism and mass politics

By the later 19th century, nationalism had surpassed the elite -driven movement and became a large -scale political ideology. With the rise of democratic elections and the rise of socialist movements, more and more nationalism is used to mobilize support for political parties.

• Colonel Belstesky, a key figure in Polish nationalism, said: “It is a country, not a country, not a country.”

• After 1880, nationalism and imperialist ideology were intertwined, and they often defended colonial rule with the guise of civilized tasks.

Modern nationalism in politics-Delhi and Bigharn elections

In contemporary India, nationalism continues to shape political narrative, especially during the election. The Delhi Election has become the battlefield of Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the AAM AADMI Party (AAP) and the Indian National Congress (INC). All parties use different nationalist strategies to consolidate their voters’ foundations The

• The People’s Party quotes nationalism based on Hindutva and portray itself as a guardian of national integrity and security.

• AAP emphasizes welfare -based nationalism, calls for ordinary people (Aam Aadmi), and promotes citizen nationalism focusing on governance.

• Congress promotes secular nationalism and emphasizes diversification and inclusive growth.

A major development of Delhi’s political pattern is to establish national identity politics and usually lead to wider national identity. The rise of the “Delhiwala Babu)” and “Bihari Mazdoor” (immigration workers from Bigharbang) and other regions such as How politics affect voters’ behavior.

• For Delhi’s elections, AAP is strategically consistent with the emotions of “Derricala”, describing itself as a political party that gives priority to local governance and specific city issues.

• For the elections of Bigharn, the People’s Party and other parties are concentrated on immigration labor voting banks, trying to integrate the identity of Bighari into a wider ethnic discourse.

The impact of these labels is essential for framework political narrative because they evoke regional pride, rejection or tolerance. Although nationalism is still a unified force, its election interpretation is usually scattered to attract specific population statistics.

Nationalism is the driving force formed by the formation of modern nation -states, reshaping the political boundary and governance structure. Although it first sought democratic participation and national unity, it had been associated with imperialism and conservative ideology by the end of the 19th and early 20th century. In modern election politics, nationalism is still a powerful mobilization force. It is often seen in the Delhi and Bighar elections to shape political identity along the region and socio -economic interface. The intersection of nationalism and identity politics will continue to affect Indian elections and broader national construction procedures.