New York Times overwhelmed on Pahalgam attack, the US government lashed out as a militant attack

The US government has pulled out the New York Times for reporting on the cowardly terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. In this attack, 26 people, including a foreign national, were shot and killed. Its responsibility was taken by Pakistan-based terrorist group The Resistance Front, a branch of the banned Lashkar-e-Taiba. But the New York Times in its report called it a “militant” attack, not a terrorist attack. The reports of the report have also said that it was Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who called “firing” a “terrorist attack”.

The US government’s Foreign Affairs Committee publicly criticized the article of New York Times on social media and described it as “away from reality”. NYT’s headline wrote, “Militants (militants) killed at least 24 tourists in Kashmir.”

Difference between militant and terrorism

Extraction or militant term is usually used for armed rebellion from within a country to get a political or social results. While terrorism has an external reference, where the use of violence to wage war against a foreign nation to destabilize the region for a large intention or purpose creates an atmosphere of fear in a particular geography.

India said in a statement on Wednesday that a top-level meeting on security chaired by the Prime Minister said that “in the briefing of the Cabinet Committee on security, the border relationship between the terrorist attack was revealed. It was noted that the attack was noted in view of the successful organization and economic growth and development of elections in the Union Territory.”